It
seems to be a question that is impossible to
answer. Nick Keene has taken the challenge to
find the closest answer with the help of Erns
Jorgensen. You'll read everything about his
research in the dossier below.
How many records has Elvis actually sold? Did he
really sell One Billion records as has been
claimed.
Nick Keene has researched this subject in depth
with help from Ernst Jorgensen at Sony BMG and
has compiled the following report.
Some might say spin and hype did not start with
politics, but in the entertainment world way
back at the time of the Roman circuses. And
nowhere will you find the air more thick with
spin or hype than in the record industry. It
seems that pretty well everybody in the business
exaggerates the achievements of their clients
perhaps because they assume that everyone else
is doing the same. Bing Crosby's disc sales were
once upon a time estimated by his record company
on the basis of a somewhat quirky analysis of
his sheet music sales and those of the Beatles
were for years inflated on the rather spurious
grounds that the sale of each one of their
albums should be considered as equivalent to six
singles. It is, however, going to come as rather
a shock when fans begin to realise that the
Presley figures have also not been immune to the
odd spot of massaging over the years. Elvis did
not sell 1 billion records by 1982 which claim
first appeared via an article in the 'Washington
Post' dated 12 July of that year and quoted RCA
as its source, nor is there any validity in the
current claim of 1.5 billion � whatever RCA/BMG
may say in the liner notes on the back of one or
two recent DVD releases. Rest assured my
investigations reveal that Elvis is still by a
distance the greatest record seller of all time,
but even some 25 years later it is no easy task
trying to establish whether or not his sales
have actually exceeded one billion copies.
So what happened? Well it seems that around five
years after Elvis died a former Radio Luxembourg
DJ by the name of Don Wardell took over from
Joan Deary as the product manager in charge of
the Elvis catalogue at RCA. And it was during
his watch that the 'Washington Post' claim first
began to appear on the back of Elvis albums and
in press releases. Somebody else in the old RCA
backroom may have initially dreamt up the
figures, but it was Don Wardell who publicised
them and thus must bear the responsibility. When
some time later after BMG took over RCA the new
team tried and failed to elicit any kind of
rational explanation from Don Wardell it swiftly
became apparent to them that he hadn�t got one.
Unfortunately it would appear that those in the
company who knew this to be the case kept quiet,
presumably because they felt stuck with a claim
that over the years had come to be largely
accepted by much of the media and regarded as
beyond dispute by the fans. Inexplicably, about
a year or so ago one or two folk in BMG probably
in the publicity department proceeded to take
this discredited claim a stage further � which
strikes me as a patently senseless and daft
approach to take since if there is one artist
whose achievements require little hype it surely
has to be Elvis Presley.
Elvis Presley 1969
So how many records has Elvis actually sold? The
truth is that nobody really knows or will ever
know, because whilst it is possible, as I will
demonstrate, to establish his likely American
sales within what I deem to be an acceptable
margin of error, Presley's international
sales-like those of many other if not all
artists- are much more difficult to ascertain.
Nevertheless it is certainly possible to put
forward a broad based estimate once a figure for
his domestic sales has been determined. The
previous 'finger in the wind' guesses by persons
unknown in his record company to the effect that
Elvis' US sales accounted for about 60% of the
total are simply not borne out by the market
evidence nor for that matter by the wealth of
gold or silver disc awards from other countries
which Elvis himself had hung up on the walls of
Graceland during his lifetime. In 1973 RCA
actually put his US sales even higher - 200 out
of the then claimed 300 million or so - when
attempting to work out where they should pitch
their initial offer in an effort to buy out
future Elvis royalties accrued through his back
catalogue, but it has now emerged that they did
not know what royalties Elvis was receiving from
overseas outlets in the first place so they
simply came up with a back of the envelope
estimate. It seems that each of the RCA
affiliated outlets overseas mailed their royalty
cheques directly to Elvis but did not send copy
correspondence to HQ. Such limited information
as has come my way from a few utterances which
have been made over the years by one or other of
Elvis Presley's many songwriters would indicate
that they have received the majority of their
royalties from overseas, but in saying that no
assessment relying on a couple of quotes is
remotely tenable. So any researcher must look
elsewhere for clues and ferret out such evidence
as exists circumstantial or otherwise.
There is for a start no question that the
American share of the global market declined
several decades ago, when other countries as far
apart as Brazil and Japan embraced Western music
and culture and this is clearly demonstrated by
the total global musical sales for the year
2005, which with figures cast in billions of
dollars reads as follows:
1
USA 7.0
2 Japan 3.7
3 UK 2.2
4 Germany 1.4
5 France 1.2
The rest 5.3
Total USA share of market 33.7%
Rest of the World 66.3%.
Elvis Presley 1970s
It doesn't come much more conclusive than that.
So the question then turns on whether Elvis'
sales conformed to this pattern.
In fact whilst a fifties classic such as 'Hound
Dog' may well have initially sold twice as many
copies in the States, as it did elsewhere-which
as only the Americans had developed a consumer
based society by that stage should hardly come
as a surprise - it is plain from what we do know
that subsequently up to70% of the sales of later
singles were sold overseas. In Europe alone
virtually all the big Presley hits from 'It's
Now or Never' onwards more than matched US
sales. Indeed the 1974/5 single 'My Boy'
actually sold more copies in the UK than it did
in the States.
More recent and better documented data adds even
more grist to the mill and demonstrates that the
picture with Presley records was and is indeed
very much in keeping with market trends. Sales
of the 2002 album '30x Number One Hits' have now
topped the 15 million mark - with a good 11
million of those sold outside the States and the
2003 release 2nd to None has sold three copies
overseas for each one sold in the USA - where it
has long since gone platinum. In addition the
majority of current single sales by any artist
in the US, whilst still of symbolic importance,
are negligible outside of those purchased for
jukeboxes, but Elvis has continued to chalk up
new sales elsewhere-over 1.4 million in the UK
alone between June 2002 and June 2005.
Twenty five years ago RCA were saying much the
same thing. The last album released during his
lifetime 'Moody Blue' was by 1982 thought to be
one of the King�s top sellers with global sales
in excess of 12 million copies. However once US
exports to Canada are excluded it seems that
less than 3 million of those were actually sold
to the home market. And as a final example on
its initial release back in 1970 the single 'The
Wonder of You' sold 990,000 copies in the USA
and some 2,200,000 overseas. The exception to
this picture is Presley's gospel music which
continues to find particular favour with the
strong Christian movement in the States and has
no parallel elsewhere.
Domestically the indications are that Elvis has
sold just over 400 million records of which
interestingly perhaps only 20% (82 million) can
be attributed to singles:
Summary Of American Sales OF 1954-2007
Category
Documented / Estimated Sales (Millions)
RIAA certified sales 169.0
Sales currently awaiting RIAA certification 8.0
Sales above/between certification levels * 57.5
Sales below minimum certification levels* 74.5
Estimated missing sales** 38.0
Excluded or disqualified RIAA sales *** 18.5
Others- estimated sales under licence **** 38.0
Total 403.5 million
* The RIAA only certify sales which reach
defined levels and therefore sales below their
radar screen and between one level and the next
level don�t count in their statistics.
** Only a few scattered sales statistics exist
for the period between March 1973 and the end of
1975, but estimates can be made on the basis of
what information is available and bearing in
mind the sales for the years either side of this
gap. The reason for this gap is that immediately
the 1973 royalty buyout came into force RCA
stopped issuing Elvis with sales figures
relating to any of his records which were
released before 1/3/1973. Although that included
the subsequent US number one hit Aloha from
Hawaii most of that album's sales were later
discovered after BMG took over RCA in 1988.
Rather it was the failure to log the incremental
sales of older records which mattered most. A
considerable number of Sun and RCA Pickwick
returns are also missing .Perhaps worst of
all-because it is not possible to make any
meaningful allowance - yet more sales were
apparently never logged on the RCA computer when
it was first installed in January 1976, some
never made it in the chaos after his death and
believe it or not some have since fallen off.
Mind boggling.
***A number of double albums were counted as one
album by the RIAA because of their playing time.
But they were sold as two albums and priced
accordingly so BMG are justifiably entitled to
count them as such. Other- that is budget-
albums were disqualified because they fell below
designated pricing parameters. If such records
are considered to be square pegs in round holes
then it is not clear why the RIAA cannot come up
with a separate category or two and perhaps in
time they will.
**** This is the elephant in the corner. After
the 1973 buyout and right up to the present day
literally dozens and dozens of heavily promoted
Elvis compilations were released through other
outlets under special licence. No less than a
staggering 30 or so independent labels operating
in the mail order sphere have been involved at
one time or another. Time-Life alone was
responsible for some 20 releases. Documentation
has started to emerge to enable certification to
proceed in one or two cases, but all too many of
these companies either no longer exist or never
kept adequate records. However projections-which
err if anything on the modest side- can be made
partly thanks to the emerging evidence from the
likes of Time-Life and the trade journal sales
reports from over the years, but also because it
seems unlikely that even those companies of
which little is known would have signed up to
RCA-BMG�s exacting terms unless they felt
confident of attracting orders running into
several hundred thousand copies per release. Or
to put it another way they wouldn�t have kept
coming back for more.
Most importantly of all are the large sales
which have accrued over the years through the
more than 240 additional RCA/ Sony- BMG albums
released in the USA and ranging from regular
releases to RCA Record Club projects which have
yet to reach the minimum RIAA thresholds. No
other artist can have been repackaged so often.
In addition there are also a considerable number
of extended play albums and singles which
likewise did not achieve gold disc status.
Elvis� royalty sheets indicate that many of his
uncertified singles sold just under half a
million copies including titles such as 'Do the
Clam', 'Such an Easy Question' and 'Love
Letters'. When the US singles market generally
went into decline from the mid 1970�s onwards so
too, quite naturally, did the sales of Elvis' 45
rpm releases but he remained a very consistent
seller right up until his death. Had a Billboard
sales chart existed back then this would have
been even more obvious than it was.
The release of so many albums over the years has
been both a curse and a blessing. It has, so
far, prevented any Elvis album officially
reaching RIAA diamond status-10 million copies;
(actually two albums have done so unofficially -
but thus far they have been denied an award for
some of the reasons mentioned above) although
this policy has undoubtedly boosted Elvis'
overall sales because of the constant promotion
of recycled material under new titles, often at
very affordable prices. The film song content of
some of the cheaper albums on display in the
superstores has occasionally upset the more
discerning Presley fan, who would rather that
the world did not know that Elvis had ever
recorded 'Old Macdonald', but the fact is that
over the years these albums have ended up in
many a shopping basket and like it or not are
one of his key sales components.
There are a number of other points to be made at
this juncture namely:
For reasons which appear to have gone to the
grave with Sam Phillips, Sun Records apparently
did not reveal anything like the full extent of
Elvis� sales when they sold his contract in
November 1955. The same happened to Jerry Lee
Lewis.
Certification of record sales requires
documentation not of any actual sales sheets,
but of the shipping invoices sent to the
distributor and the returns of unsold discs made
to the supplier. Such a requirement can
obviously be that much more onerous if any third
parties with little or no interest in the
subject are involved in the process.
The RIAA include all sales of a disc whether or
not there has been a change in the catalogue
number. Thus for example the platinum award for
'Frankie and Johnny' comprises sales both from
the original 1966 release and the 1976 budget
album.
Despite the clear inadequacy of their overseas
book keeping arrangements RCA were somehow able
to come up with global sales estimates during
Elvis' career which the author feels are
reasonably believable including the following:
1959-50 million; 1964/5-100 million later
revised to 125 million; 1970- 250 million and in
1976-400 million. It was only when he died that
things appeared to go awry.
It is not generally appreciated that during the
1950's Elvis probably sold more extended play
albums than he did long playing albums. Given
the technology of the day EP's were simply
easier to handle and also less costly.
Sony BMG will NOT spend money on historical
research into Elvis' past RCA sales and it is
useless remonstrating with them. Even EPE appear
to have lost interest in pursuing the subject
since this article was at one point going to
appear on the Graceland website but that�s
another story�.
The sheer number of releases made around the
globe makes it impossible to detail
international sales in the same way. Many local
releases achieved truly staggering sales
figures. For example little Denmark purchased an
incredible 150,000 copies of a 1968 release
entitled 'A Portrait in Music', whilst in 1974
the double album '40 Greatest Hits' shattered
almost every known speed sales record set in the
UK. A German inspired release entitled 'Elvis
Forever' and its successors swept Europe around
1975 and so on.
Much comment has been made about the impact of
Elvis' death on his sales-some of it grossly
exaggerated by the media-but little note has
been taken of the unprecedented demand for
Presley product released in the Far East
especially Japan during the period 1970 to 1975,
thanks largely to the extraordinary impact of
his filmed or recorded concert performances.
Before discovering that South East Asia has long
been one of Elvis� main markets outside of the
States, I would have said that sales of all
English language records would be lower in non
English speaking countries than in those where
Anglo-Saxon is the mother tongue, but when I
further discovered- just to take a couple of
examples- that 'You don�t have to say you love
me' was the top English language single of 1971
in Japan with a reported sale of nearly one
million and that the Christmas 1975 single
'Bringing it back' -a comparatively minor hit in
the States-reached number one in the Thailand
charts I realised that the music of Elvis
Presley had truly transcended language barriers
in a way nobody else had ever done.
It would seem that the growth of sales in
overseas markets generally began to take off
around the time Elvis was demobbed from the army
in 1960.The statistics show that in the UK
market for example overall sales in 1959 climbed
from 66 million units to over 100 million by
1964 with incidentally the sales of albums
overtaking singles around 1968. As already
mentioned there is no doubt that from the
release of 'It's Now or Never' onwards Presley�s
singles began to hit sales figures especially in
Europe which were beyond those achieved in the
States. All this appears to be additionally
backed up by the following indicators namely:
# The considerable number of known singles which
managed to sell over a million copies worldwide,
all in the period between 1960 and 1977, despite
selling LESS than half of that total in the USA.
# Yet more singles from the same period which
achieved an RIAA award by selling just over half
a million copes at home, but thanks to
international sales EASILY passed the million
mark all told. At the request of the Colonel
himself RCA did at least keep a score of the
individual global sales of singles for possible
inclusion on a subsequent gold disc album.
Specific evidence of this can be found, for
example, in the RCA brochure which accompanied
the tour of Australia by Elvis Presley's gold
Cadillac in 1968. This listed no less than 45
million sellers and 19 half million sellers up
to that time.
# Those singles which were NEVER released in the
States, but were huge hits in a wide range of
countries overseas, including amongst others 'A
Mess of Blues' (1960), 'Wooden Heart' (1961), 'I
Just Can�t Help Believing' (1971) and 'The Girl
of My Best Friend' (1976).
# Contrary to folklore sales WERE documented and
certified in several key overseas markets as far
back as the 1950's. In the UK the now long
moribund 'Disc and Music Echo' pop magazine had
by 1970 awarded Elvis around two dozen silver
discs for sales of singles in excess of 250,000
copies. On a per head of population basis sales
in the UK compared very favourably with the USA.
# On the album front according to an RCA press
release issued in May 1965 and published in
Billboard magazine only some 14 million, out of
a total of the first 100 million Elvis records
sold globally were for long playing discs. Sales
of the latter then doubled within the next 3
years coinciding exactly with market trends
although in Elvis' case much of this should be
credited not to the film soundtrack recordings,
whose sales were solid rather than spectacular,
but to the album releases of the fifties and
early sixties since these clearly achieved the
bulk of their sales only AFTER the end of 1964.
All that can be easily deduced from a glance at
Elvis' certified domestic sales for albums
released in the years between 1956 and 1964 and
by comparing that figure to the May 1965
statement. Indeed it was the sustained upsurge
in sales of his old albums that enabled RCA to
proudly claim in a 1966 New Year�s Day telegram
to the Colonel that 1965 had been Elvis' best
year to date beating out even 1956. The sales of
his new records, whilst still pretty healthy,
could not by themselves have possibly accounted
for this quite astonishing feat.
# What seems to have caused this jump in album
sales and why was it so noticeable overseas?
Well remember this was around the time when the
Beatles, the Stones and the rest of the 'beat'
groups exploded onto the scene which event
occurred in Europe before America and caused
sales to leap to unheard of figures benefiting
all artists. Happily - at least for record
company profits- this musical revolution
coincided with teenagers all over the world,
including the post army �second� wave of fans
picked up by Elvis, discovering that they were
able to persuade or cajole their parents into
shelling out a bit more pocket money than their
elder brothers or sisters were used to
receiving. In addition many of the latter, who
would have been amongst the first wave of Elvis
fans back in the mid 1950's, were ten years on,
beginning to get into regular employment . Very
probably many of these fans used their newly
found purchasing powers to acquire ALL the
classic Presley albums they had previously been
unable to afford and in particular to replace
worn out singles with the gold disc albums. In
short the consumer society had by now reached
out beyond the shores of America.
# Finally in 1987 the Elvis estate placed on
display at Graceland an unusual, if slightly
bewildering award they had received from RCA,
citing no less than 48 titles that had qualified
under internal company criteria for worldwide
gold disc status, but which had in considerable
part previously gone unrecognised. This award
caused some head scratching at the time - but it
has some relevance since it included a HOST of
mid sixties soundtrack albums which even today
have failed to achieve domestic certification.
The point here is that this award implies that
over half of these sales must have been accrued
from foreign parts. Thus all the evidence
appears to point towards an overall
international sales figure that is at LEAST 60 %
of total global sales - that is just over 600
million copies after duly adjusting the domestic
total which thus represents 40%. On the basis of
recent known sales it could be argued that
overseas sales might be as high as 65% or more
which indeed would still be broadly in line with
the percentage attributed to the sales of the
Beatles and other artists. But as Elvis' sales
history goes back further than the latter and I
don�t subscribe to the Don Wardell school of
mathematics I will stick to the lower figure
here.
Conclusion
So I feel that it now seems safe to say that
known sales of Presley records have now passed
that coveted billion - albeit up to 25 years
later than his record company first claimed that
he had! Indeed if you like the 'lost' sales
which I previously mentioned-that might be
anything up to another 100 million who knows -
can stand as some sort of further buffer against
any error in these calculations but there is
little doubt in my mind that Elvis Presley has
become the one and only person to sell a billion
copies of his recorded works. All of which
places him several hundred million ahead of
anyone else. As a BMG executive once remarked
it�s not close. And nobody else is at the races.
Despite Michael Jackson's recent claims I
frankly doubt that the gloved one is anywhere
near the Beatles (600 million) far less Elvis.
To those fans who will protest that this feature
is somehow letting the side down I say sorry,
but it is not my fault that in the past your
expectations-and mine- were raised so high. As
for any doubters in the media whose support
inclines to other artists well fine � let us see
your statistics and estimates, but until they
are produced then there is little more to say.
Even in his afterlife Elvis continues to reign
supreme. Amen to that.
But finally please remember that statistics
alone do not prove that any particular recording
artist or group can be said to be the best of
all time. Certainly in terms of hard facts and
figures it might be argued that Elvis was the
greatest artist or act we have seen so far- but
anything else is just an opinion not a fact. And
as for the continuing Beatles v Elvis debate it
is surely a flawed one. How can you sensibly
compare a group of people to one especially when
their music is as different as chalk and cheese?
Whereas Elvis' claim to musical prowess was
based on the magnificent instrument that was his
voice not to mention his extraordinary
interpretative powers, both of which continually
served to inspire his session musicians to raise
their game to new heights , that of the Beatles
rests on their superb song writing skills and
inventiveness. In more ways than one these two
greats came from a different place. Let it
finally rest there I say.
Source: Elvis Australia / Nick Keene
Posted: 4th. August 2007